About Me

Name: wingnut
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

More Spanish Civil War Books:

An International History Of The Spanish Civil War, M. Alpert, Basingstoke, 1994.

Blood Of Spain, R. Fraser, London, 1979.

The Spanish Civil War, Hugh Thomas, London, 1961, 1977, 1982.

This is probably the most classic account of the war because the Franco regime's censorship and supression of information made truth a lasting legacy of the war until the liberalization of the 1960s. For the first time, a comprehensive account of what actually happened had been created and was circulated worldwide. The regime tried to ban it, but the genie was out of the bottle and led to over 40 years of new scholarship.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

More Books:

War Means Fighting, Fighting Means Killing -- Pea Ridge To The Seven Days, (Vol. 2 of The Civil War, A Narrative), Shelby Foote, Random House, 1958.
Shelby Foote was obviously one of the top handful of American Civil War historians. His books have all been fast, engrossing reading. And, he was so frequently on PBS and History Channel Civil War documentary series. This series of books has great regional maps that I like because of bright colors with high contrast.
 
The Spanish Civil War -- 1936-1939, Frances Lannon, Osprey Publishing, 2002.
I decided to add books about The Spanish Civil War to 'Civil War Sunday' because this war, unfortunately, is our only model for taking OUR country back. We MAY have ONE MORE CHANCE via the elections of 2010, but if that fails to FREE the House and Senate again, then I don't think these communists will ever lose control without a fight. This war may be the model for the Phase 3 of how we end our 149 year Civil War (as I wrote about in the article weeks ago).
 
The Battle For Spain -- The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939. Antony Beevor, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 2006.
A huge volume of 432 pages and 50 pages of notes. A blow by blow account of every battle and campaign. Lots of maps. Western leftists have so ignored this war because THEY LOST IT. Any descriptions we have heard have always been distorted and biased against Franco and his Nationalists. I think it is EXTREMELY important for Christians and Conservatives to, at least, look into this war and see it in it's more accurate place in 20th century politics.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

More Books:

Leaders Of The Lost Cause -- New Perspectives On The Confederate High Command, Edited by Gary W. Gallagher & Joseph T. Glatthaur, Stackpole Books, 2004.

Gettysburg -- An Alternate History, Peter G. Tsouras, Greenhill Books, 2002.

Gray Fox -- Robert E. Lee and The Civil War, Burke Davis, The Fairfax Press, 1956.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

"It's Time To End This 149 Year Civil War"

I've been thinking about a comparison between The English Civil War (1640 to 1660) and the American Civil War (1861 to 1865). The English War was a clash between two religions, Catholic vs. Protestant, while the U.S. War was a clash (ultimately) between two ideologies, Liberal vs. Conservative as we would define them today.

Though the Wars differ in the spiritual, they may share a structure that is interesting. The English War spanned three phases. Phase 1 was a shooting war from about 1640 to 1645. Phase 2 was a 10-year period of peace under Puritan rule while the other side, never really conquered, geared up for Phase 3, another 5-year shooting war. Sometime after the Catholic final victory and the restoration of Charles II to the English throne, a system of tolerance for both religions was set up and continues until the present. It was the correct solution.

The American War had its Phase 1, a shooting war, and has continued in the same ideological WAR ever since. Conservatism and Liberalism have swapped places several times as they have vied for dominance over each other. Has the last 144 years been our Phase 2? Will there be a Phase 3 shooting war again? If so, then for that phase to be a true CIVIL WAR, the two ideologies must vie for power of the OVERALL GOVERNMENT. The South's War For Independence was a move of misunderstanding.

What would be the correct ending or solution for such a war? It can ONLY be the headship of conservatism. Just as a husband is to be head of the wife and of the whole family, conservatism must be at the head of all government branches. When Liberalism becomes head, it is analogous to the wife usurping authority over her husband. When she "wears the pants in the family", a dysfunctional family is inevitable. Liberalism has a place in the BODY (culture and life) of a country, but when it controls the head, economic disaster, culture rot, military weakness, and numerous other ills quickly set in.

A clash to finally end this Civil War and set things PERMANENTLY right will never happen as long as conservatives "talk", "tea party", and "protest". The Iranians tried all that in their streets last summer. How'd that work out? Wars are ONLY fought by generals, NOT by moms! We need a Robert E. Lee, a Stonewall Jackson, a Francisco Franco, an Eisenhower, a MacArthur, a Patton, and maybe . . . hmm . . . a Schwartzkopf, Franks, and Patreus! We need generals who are on the side of GOOD and who love this country enough to save it from New World Order socialists and fascists. Those socialists and fascists merely laugh at the protestors as they continue their plans to crush the life out of OUR country. Wake up generals! It's your turn now!

--RPC, Sunday, November 8, 2009

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

Could The South Have Won The "Civil" War?

This question has been the subject of so much speculation for so long that the real question is "Why bother?" The answer is that, of course The CSA could have won The War and their independence. They lost it for a variety of reasons. They lost because of botched opportunities at numerous battles. On more than one occasion, they could have ended The War with a quick stroke or even the capture of Washington D.C. They lost because of poor leadership from Richmond. This was as much due to political bickering as it was to Jeff Davis' myopic and constant attempt to run The War from The Presidential Mansion and assign generals based on favor rather than merit. Finally, they lost because, I believe, it was not ORDAINED that they win separation. A prophecy of Jacob in The Bible ordained that Mannassa (USA) would split from his brother Ephraim (Great Britain), but no such prophecy ordained that Mannassa would then split in two. Lest you think this is silliness, the prophecy was widely believed in the 18th century and was an official part of Anglican doctrine until it was removed for fear of aiding The American Revolution.

The war of 1861-65 was NOT actually a Civil War. It was a war for Southern Independence. What the Southern leaders SHOULD have done was wage a TRUE Civil War to take control of the overall government in Washington. That would have been a victory of Conservatism over Liberalism. That would have been Civil War of the same type as The Spanish Civil War which inevitably will be OUR model for what we will have to do here in our future.

The South should not have STARTED such a war. Both sides waited a long time for the other to fire the first shot. If and when The North fired first somewhere, The South would have had the moral right to then launch a Civil War and move on Washington. What actually sparked The War was either impatience, hubris, or just plain stupidity by either local Charleston leadership or by Jeff Davis himself depending on which historian is to be believed. Fort Sumter was fired on and the game was afoot.

As for the issue of slavery, that institution would have ended in any case. The United States was the only major power that, by 1861, still allowed it. The issues of slavery and of States' Rights SHOULD have been handled by The Supreme Ct. Both were appealed to The Court numerous times. But the Justices dropped the ball. They were too chicken to rule on these hot potatoes.

Westward expansion of new states in free areas, European revulsion and boycotts over slavery, new technology that loosed hand labor, and eventually film and modernism would have forced the end of slavery. But the States' Right to Secede issue has never really been solved! No new Amendment to The Constitution ever spelled out a final judgement. Northern Liberals, as usual, think that silence is acquiescence is agreement and that therefore no further codification is necessary! They spoke, "Make it so." And it WAS so. The 10th Amendment still stands as the argument that Confederates used for their actions.

Texas' Constitution of 1845 specifically spelled out in words a protection for it's right to secede at any time and for any reason. This was sealed by a treaty which, according the U.S. Constitution, became "Law Of The Land" for The USA! Yet Abe Lincoln trashed that Law Of The Land and FORCED Texas back into The Union! Later, a new State Constitution was FORCED on it's people via Northern Reconstructionists! Even if we accept that the other 10 states did an illegal thing by seceding, NO ONE can argue that Texas did. Could Texas therefore, actually, legally, maybe . . . be the only remaining part of The CSA? Today, Northern Liberalism has ruined northern States. We speak of the "Rust Belt" and high unemployment across them. The South has been in ascendency and Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma are three of the four biggest energy producing States. Industries have been relocating to the "right to work" South. Things don't look so good now for The North. Maybe The South actually DID win The "Civil" War!

--RPC, Sunday, November 1, 2009

References:

Command Magazine, "Could The South Have Won The Civil War?, Issue 35, Nov. '95

Dixie Betrayed -- How The South Really Lost The Civil War, David J. Eicher, Little, Brown, &

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

Book Review:

Last Flag Down -- The Epic Journey Of The Last Confederate Warship, John Baldwin & Ron Powers, Crown Publishers, NY, 2007, 332pp.

This is the story of The CSS Shenandoah, the second most famous and successful Confederate Raider (the CSS Alabama being first) and the only Southern capital ship to sail completely around The World. She was purchased surreptitiously at a London dockyard and put to sea disguised as the coal freighter "Sea King" on October 7, 1864.

Sea King rendezvoused with a Southern supply ship at The Madeira Islands where cannons, powder, ammo, and a new crew were brought aboard. October 19th saw the commissioning of the new warship and the start of a mission that would take her around Africa, through The Indian Ocean to Melbourne, Australia where CSA sympathy was strong, and then up to the whaling grounds of The North Pacific to prey on Yankee vessels.

At the time, Shenandoah was likely the fastest ship on the planet because she was actually an early design upon which the famous clipper ships of the 1870s were based. She WAS a clipper ship except with both steam and sail. She even had a propeller screw that could be lifted out of the water for reduced drag. She was a clipper fitted for destruction. Her first owners had built her specifically to race the first tea from the latest Chinese harvests to the ravenous London markets. The first cargo to arrive each season was allowed to set the price and, in effect, corner the market. Barely 1 year old, she had set the London to Bombay and back speed record. She was 230 feet long, 32.5 feet wide, weighed 1,018 tons, and had a 250 hp steam engine. These early clippers were built to survive the worst storms and were able to ride WITH the storms (under full topsail) rather than INTO their winds (to ride them out without sail). These ships were known to cover 400 miles in a single day of "storm riding".

Unknown to Shenandoah's crew as they sped north past The Philippine Islands on April 9, 1865, General Lee was 10,000 miles away surrendering to General Grant at Appomatox Courthouse. But Shenandoah's intended mission had not yet begun. She wreaked havoc on whalers over the next four months with 38 total "prizes". She captured and sank 24 of them in one two week span. Finally, on August 2, 1865, the Raider's crew learned from a British vessel they met just west of Baja, California, that The War had been over. First Officer Conway Whittle, upon whose diary/log this book is based, wrote that it was "the darkest day of my life". Rather than surrender immediately and face possible trial and death as pirates, the men decided to return to England. They sailed around Cape Horn and arrived in Liverpool on November 6, 1865. The ship was sold to The Sultan Of Zanzibar who used her as his personal yacht. She broke up on a reef in The Indian Ocean during a storm in 1879.

There may be some sort of new mini-cult following for this ship and her story as I count at least 5 recent books about her. Here is a list of others :

The Last Shot -- The Incredible Story Of The CSS Shenandoah And The True Conclusion Of The American Civil War, Lynn Schooler, Harper Collins, 2005.

Confederate Raider In The North Pacific -- The Saga Of The CSS Shenandoah, Murray Morgan, Wash. State Univ. Press, 1995.

Sea Of Gray -- The Around-The-World Odyssey Of The Confederate Raider Shenandoah, Tom Chaffin, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2006.

Gallant Rebel -- The Fabulous Cruise Of The CSS Shenandoah, Stanley F. Horne, Rutgers Univ. Press, 1947.

CSS Shenandoah -- The Memoirs of Lt. Commanding James I. Waddell, Annapolis Naval Institute Press, 1996.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

Today is the Last Great Day Holy Day, so no writing is ready, just a coupla books --

More Books:

Under Two Flags -- The American Navy In The Civil War, William M. Fowler, Jr. , Naval Institute Press (Bluejacket Books), 1990.
Mostly about Northern ships, but a final chapter covers the exploits of the Confederate Raiders. The accounts of the four most famous ones, Sumter, Florida, Alabama, and Shenandoah are detailed. In all, about 20 Confederate raiders took about 300 Union ships totalling 120,000 tons and worth about $20 million. Also, herein are numerous Union ironclad operations as well as Admiral Farragut's famous battle of Mobile Bay. The book is 284 pages with 15 pages of pictures. Great stuff !

--RPC, Sunday, October 11, 2009

(Another book here soon about the CSS Shenandoah. Check back in a couple more days).

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

New Books:

Flawed Victory -- A New Perspective On The Civil War, William L. Barney, University Press Of America, 1980.
This is another book that does not just blindly accept the usual myths about The War concocted by Northern historians. Remember - the side that wins any war gets to rewrite it's history. The author discusses the total destruction of The South (1/3 of The USA population) economically and culturally. The literal "rape" of any leftover wealth as crops, farm animals, and equipment that was sent north by corrupt northern officials during "Reconstruction" days was deplorable. Barney says that, ". . .America's identity as a nation is more intimately related to that (1861-65, sic) war than to the revolution against the British, . . ." Later, "To restructure the Union required a stretching of The Constitution . . ." The Confederacy ran into the same clash between THEIR desire for State's rights and a need for the centralization of controls. The end result was a new FORM of government based on nationalism with supreme authority in Washington. The first Republic of The Founding Fathers actually collapsed in 1860. Abraham Lincoln ". . . marked a shift of power to The Presidency that raised for the first time the specters of unrestrained executive leadership and uncompromising nationalism that would prove mixed blessings in the twentieth century." All this is why I say to Glenn Beck that the destruction of our Constitution actually began HERE and NOT with the Progressives of the early 20th century. The "dual sovereignty" of State's Rights and Federal Government attempted by our Constitution was actually one of the HOLES in it from the beginning. See my article below "We Are Seeing The Holes In our Constitution" about our Supreme Court. With all these HOLES, it is nonsensical for anyone to knowledgeably say that "We need to get back to The Constitution!"
--Ray Curtis, Sunday October 4, 2009
see also The South Was Right, Kennedy & Kennedy 1994 for similar arguments

Grant And Sherman -- The Friendship That Won The Civil War, Charles Bracelen Flood, Harper Perrenial, 2005.
They first fought together at Shiloh and developed the final strategy to cut The South into thirds after Chattanooga in late '63. This book explores Grant and Sherman's early years as well as years shortly after The War. With battle maps in black and white, the book is about 400 pages and exists in both paperback and hardback. --RPC

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

"When Overlooked Warriors Are Unleashed"

What did David of ancient Israel and Robert E. Lee of our Southern Confederacy have in common? Well, to begin, each was overlooked by the "manly men" of his day. Neither was expected to ever amount to much as a soldier. Both were mild-mannered, soft spoken, and unagressive by any masculine definition. But behind the visible persona of each lay a hidden warrior that only needed to be matched with it's moment. Their warrior spirit was not based on brawn, bravado, display, or bluff. These two would win with brainpower, and that even when applied against superior numbers. The best thing about these two stories for me is the attitude of "Wow, who knew?" by everyone in the nations involved.

David's story begins in 1 Samuel 16:1 . God said to the prophet Samuel, ". . . go; I will send you to Jesse the Bethlehemite, for I have provided for Myself a king among his sons." Jesse passed his 7 oldest sons before Samuel, but Samuel had to say that the Lord had not chosen any of them. Samuel asked if there were any other sons. Notice Jesse's attitude: Well, yeah, there is the youngest, but he's just a shepherd boy. It can't POSSIBLY be HIM! I mean, come on! Let's just have a good laugh and move on (re-creation provided by me). But David WAS the one, and little did his "manly" father and brothers know that he would be a giant killer and ancient Israel's greatest warrior-king.

Robert E. Lee's story begins in the Spring of 1861. He was the third of the four top Generals of The Armies of The Confederate States Of America. This rank was set by seniority out of West Point. But Lee was not thought of as a "manly man". He couldn't POSSIBLY be a good field leader as he was too quiet and inward. So he was assigned to patrol the Shenandoah Valley region. A series of embarrassing losses in small clashes earned him the nickname "Granny Lee". He was relocated down to Charleston, South Carolina, exchanging places with P.G. T. Beauregard who was then in place to participate at First Bull Run in July. To be fair to Lee, though, the Shenandoah Valley experienced unusually excessive rainfall in the Spring of '61. Neither side could claim any important victories there and the sheer weight of numbers of men, superior weapons, and shorter supply lines from Harper's Ferry allowed Yankee soldiers to hold their own against ANY foe.

So, General Robert E. Lee's first year of war for his new country was a dismal mediocrity. Then came the Battle of Seven Pines in late May of '62. Union General George McClellan had been slowly advancing his massive Army west toward Richmond in his Peninsular Campaign. A huge clash finally began at Seven Pines on May 30th. Confederate moves were a confused mess of disorganized effort. Then, General Joe Johnston was wounded in the foot and taken to a field hospital. General Lee had to assume command. The Unknown Warrior's moment had come.

Lee's first order to the newly renamed Army Of Northern Virginia was to dig in, an action thought to be beneath the dignity of soldiers. But from May 31st on, war would have a new style. General McClellan had 100,000 men on the south side of The Chickahominy River. Another 40,000 Yankees sought to join them from the north side. Lee had only 40,000 himself. He brought in his favorite lietenant, General Stonewall Jackson from The Shenandoah Valley. With Jackson's 17,000 men, a brilliant ballet of multiple manuever, strike, and flank began to roll back the Union forces. A series of 6 major battles over 7 days that came to be known as The Seven Days Battles ended in mass retreat back to Washington for McClellan, "The Little Napoleon". The Battles of Oak Grove (June 25th), Gaines' Mill (June 27th), Garnett's Farm (June 28th), Savage Station (June 29th), White Oak Swamp (June 30th), and Malvern Hill (July 1st -- a Confederate defeat but then abandoned by Federals) are still studied in war colleges today. Everyone was stunned and no one doubted that a new military legend had entered the history books.

Overlooked, yet giant killers. How many more times will we need to see this?

Application For Today:
Pride goes before the fall -- whether it be in war or politics.
--RPC, Sunday September 20, 2009
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

"The Single Bullet Theory"

The Confederacy might have won it's war for independence early on had it not been for the bullet that struck General Albert Sidney Johnston in the afternoon of the first day of the Battle of Shiloh. He was the highest ranked of the four top generals of the new nation. Rank and theater of operation were awarded by seniority and that determined by date of commission out of West Point. Johnston was well liked by his troops and their motivation and moral couldn't be higher on the eve of battle.

Major General Ullysses S. Grant had been landing troops and supplies at Pittsburg Landing for several days as the North's Tennessee Valley Campaign aimed to take Corinth, Mississippi, the big railroad junction farther south. But Grant's security had been lax. Incredibly, sporadic reports of possible enemy activity in the woods all around the area either never reached higher officers or were ignored. No major resistance was expected. So when the Confederates burst out of the woods that clear Sunday morning April 6, 1862, Grant's future as an Army commander might have been ended.

The Confederate onslaught caught the Yankees by surprise and rolled their whole chaotic lines back toward the Tennessee River. General Johnston was bold enough and would have finished his attack by carrying it on through the night. But a stray bullet struck him in the knee at around 1:30pm and he bled to death within an hour. The general who assumed command merely held ground which allowed General Grant to regroup, reinforce, and counterattack the next day. Thus, Shiloh is generally seen as a victory for the North and bolstered Grant's reputation as a winner. Brigadier General Sherman, latter to become Grant's right hand man, was nearly killed in this battle, too, as Confederate troops surprised and fired on his horseback scouting party.

Generals Grant and Sherman might have been captured or at least disgraced enough to have prevented their later appointments had General Johnston lived. But the same bullet that killed General Johnston saved General Grant. Grant learned from his errors. He would never again be so careless.

Application For Today:
We Christians and Conservatives became lazy when we should have maintained careful watch over our government.  We were lax while the enemy (communists!) waited to pounce.  They busted out of the woods in 2008 and overwhelmed our positions.  We fell back in chaos and confusion.  But fortunately, this time, the enemy has shot himself in the foot.  He "acted stupidly".  His Cap And Tax, and his Health Care Fiasco, etc. have stalled his advance.  We have counterattacked, but if a situation like this ever occurs again, we may not be so lucky.
 
--RPC, Sunday September 13, 2009
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIVIL WAR SUNDAY

New Books List:

The Oxford Dictionary Of Civil War Quotations, ed. John D. Wright, Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.

The Civil War -- Strange And Fascinating Facts, Burke Davis, The Fairfax Press, New York, 1982.

Lincoln's Generals, ed. Gabor S. Boritt, Oxford University Press, 1994.

Lincoln -- The Road To War, Frank van der Linden, Fulcrum Publishing, 1998.

Ulysses S. Grant -- The Unlikely Hero, Michael Korda, Harper Collins, 2004.

Civil War Battles, Roxby Press Productions Ltd., 1977.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nitpicking The Pundits -- for Fri. Aug. 21, '09

DOYLE:
1)  in hr.1, Pat Buchanan and Jerry talked about Third Party efforts to win elections and agreed that such is impossible today.  Pat thinks that huge amounts of money and charismatic candidates are necessary and lacking in outsider groups.  So, I say . . . WRONG!  The real problem is the very STRUCTURE of our election system.  If we continue with this ONE-DAY ELECTION system, then we will continue to be CONTROLLED by the two parties.  This is another of the SERIOUS holes in our Constitution!  I am working on an article (half finished) that proposes we amend The Constitution to set up a 4-round PLAYOFF system (like any other sports playoffs) that would open things up to an unlimited number of parties.  Watch for it at this site.
 
2)  in hr.3, Jerry discusses Jon Voight's statement that Obama is leading us toward a Civil War.  So, I say . . . Yes, we are headed in that direction, BUT, we can control it's nature IF we have the right LEADER.  Jerry seems to think we can all act like a giant flock of birds -- 100 million of us turning instantly together in whatever direction we must go.  NO!  man is a species that acts more like SHEEP.  Sheep need a SHEPHERD!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Books

Power To The People,  Laura Ingraham,  Regnery, 2007
 
A Glorious Disaster -- Barry Goldwater's Presidential Campaign and the Origins of the Conservative Movement,  J. William Middendorf II,  Basic Books, 2006
 
The Most Glorious Fourth  -- Vicksburg and Gettysburg July 4th, 1863,  Duanne Schultz,  Norton, 2002
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »