BECK:
in hr. 2, Glenn said that Republicans aren't any better than Democrats and cited Orrin Hatch as an example. He must see the distinction between the two halves of The Republican Party. There is the liberal group, which he is really thinking of here, and the truly conservative group which he should NOT lump in with the others. As I have said in a previous article, it is time for the christian/conservative wing of The Republican Party to separate.
In hr. 3, Glenn seems to be saying that all we need to do is ask questions of Obama. Keep asking, "Did you know Mr. President . . .?" But we can only go so far with questions. Then what? We can only go so far with tea parties and marches on Washington. Then what? We saw two polar opposite examples this summer of how to handle a dictatorship. Iranians rioted and demonstrated in the streets of many cities in Iran after the rigged elections of June 12th. It all died down eventually and the same leaders are still in power. Honduras handled a dictatorial power grab correctly. Their legislature impeached their president and their Top Court upheld the legislature's decision. The Army was only called in to remove the LEFTIST would-be dictator when he wouldn't leave. It was NOT a "coup". My point is that FORCE will always be necessary to remove an evil leader. Will WE learn? Are we too chicken to do what is necessary?
RUSH:
In hr. 3, Liberals always talk of 'Health Care' in terms of 'limited resources'. Why should the field have 'limited resources'? If they are 'limited' then increase them. Don't just try to ration what exists. Leftist thinking is myopic. Allow conditions for growth. More schools, students, resource funds, and competition would make the whole idea of 'limited resources' ridiculous.
DOYLE:
In hr. 3, Guest Wayne Allyn Root says that at the next election we should vote them ALL out. Bad idea. We need to make a list of all libs, socialists, and communists to vote out and make sure all the pundit shows coordinate with it. There is nothing wrong with making a LIST! I am in favor of a complete turnover at each election, but only if we have a built in system of term limits as I have laid out in a previous article below.